Once upon a time, long and far ago, perhaps even back to the
time of Jesus, there must not have been ideal social images than women were
forced to fit. However in today’s modern day and age, everyone is physically
expected to fit into our perception of beauty in order to feel liked by others
for who they are. For example as portrayed even by something as simple as a toy
doll that girls grow up with, the concept that they must be long legged, sleek,
or have a “Thirty-nine-inch bust and a twenty-three-inch waist,” are simple
norms that are faced in growing up in today’s day and age. This leads to much
insecurity within ourselves as we struggle to inch closer to images that are
created through shaping plastic, or extensive computer editing. Though
irrational, the train of thought is very simple. This is how people on
magazines look; this is how I should look. This train of thought is what sets today’s
standards as high as they are, and what keeps them always just one step above
our reach. Even when considering standards set for males, it is still hard to
expect everyone to consist of: A chiseled face, sharp jawbone, abs, and so on.
Overall today’s beauty standards are as unreachable as pink elephants, and no
matter how much we try to chase the perfect image, or how much of ourselves we
sacrifice for it in the end it will always be just another step away from us.
Monday, October 31, 2016
Sunday, October 23, 2016
The seen and Unseen
In our daily lives, our race and ethnicity and two very different things that end up determining a lot about us as people, both to all of those around us, and also to ourselves. As concluded in our class discussions this past week, race tends to be knows as how an individual is referred to by other people or how an individual person is stereotyped by public views and perceptions. On the other hand, Ethnicity tends to be seen as how we are viewed culturally or religiously within ourselves or within or families and friends. The public tends to create how we are seen from the perspective of race, often through categorization through skin color or looks etc. In that sense it is not possible for us to change our race, as we are simply to make due with what is given to us and how it is publicly acted upon. Our ethnicity however is not something that we are born with or bound to. It is something that we learn from those close to us in our upbringing and something we look to for internal self definition through our lives. Our ethnicity is not decided for us by society unlike, how as we concluded in class, our race often times seems to be. However despite the social constraints to something as key to our identity as our race, "It doesnt define who we are as a person, because any way of defining it is easily constructed."
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Artie's emotional Comic
In Art Spiegalman’s story Maus, the
author tells the story of a mouse Arthur and his father’s experiences in the
holocaust as repeated to him by his father. His father tells him how he lived through
wartime and the era of the Nazi’s and all the challenges that he endured as his
son takes notes in order to create a comic he hopes to sell about the suffering
faces by Jew’s during that historical period. During his father’s stories
however, there generally seems to be a rift in tone between Arthur himself and
his Father. At points it seems as if both of them are each on their own
extremes as far as what they want out of their conversations with each other,
where Arthur seems to simply want a story, and his Father seems to need company
and someone to talk to. However much more of Arthur’s emotional side is
revealed when his old comic “Prisoner on the Hell Planet” is found by his
Father and Mala. As the comic is shown to the reader, it reveals the struggles
that a character (seemingly portraying him) faces when having to cope with his mother’s
suicide. This comic is very insightful to the character of Arthur himself in
the story as it shows that despite the attitude that he takes on in front of
his father, that he feels immense guilt at the death of his mother due to how
he treated her the night before, as he stated he “Turned away, resentful of the
way she tightened the umbilical cord,” and also how in his comic the voices in
his head were given life under the form of other people that told him how it
was “His fault” and how he “Had better cried while your mother was still alive.”
Sunday, October 9, 2016
Dreams vs. Reality
Dreams vs. Reality
As perfect
as a situation may be in our head, many times it never carries over into the
real lives we live in our everyday life. As shown in Kingston’s vision in the chapter
“White Tigers”, she views herself as being ferocious, brave, and fearless. She
is seen climbing a mountain to meet a new family and to learn techniques to
become strong warrior. I believe however that this was simply her way of coping
with the issues and injustices that she faced in her real life; Her dream of
her being a ferocious warrior was how he managed to compliment the emotional strength
that she lacked so much in her real life. This is seen in the difference in how
the author addresses herself in her dream as opposed to how she addresses herself
in real life. For example how Kingston sais “I leapt on to my horse’s back and
marveled at the power and height it gave me”, it is her own subconscious way of
giving herself power, and she goes on to imagine all that she would do with
this power given to her. She however in reality is forced to submit too many
others in her life due to her own lack of power. She is treated poorly by her
parents and by her boss at work, and even though it helped her find how she can
create long term change for those in her position, no amount of wistful
dreaming could help her gain the power and strength to successfully demand what
she wanted out of others, unlike her warrior self who was able to.
Sunday, October 2, 2016
Order by Chaos
Order by Chaos
Throughout the discussions this week on
Henry David Thoreau’s work, On the Duty
of Civil Disobedience, as a class we talked through many of the ideas and
concepts he demonstrated in this piece on how he viewed the government and how
he thinks the American citizens should act toward it. His central idea, around which many of his
ideals were based on, comes from the motto he refers to in his work, “The
government is best which governs least.” At the time in which Thoreau was
alive, this idea was simply a concept of how an optimal government should be
handled. Even in today’s day and age with our social and technological
advancements, a nation run by those ungoverned is still an idea far beyond our
grasp. So under which circumstances then, would Thoreau’s ideal government then
work in? The way that Thoreau intended his motto to be viewed is that in a
perfect world, and a nation filled with perfect people, who commit no crime or
injustices, and always manage to reach important decisions together, are the people for whom the government that “Governs least” is intended. However even
here in 2016 we are far from this endpoint described by Thoreau, and as a
society we cannot function without a functional government to provide the
nation with a stable backbone.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)